My dad used surface-gap "Fire Injectors" in his 1957 Ford 6-cylinder sedan, along with various other fuel-saving devices that he saw advertised in the back of Popular Science. None of those devices seemed to help much.
I think the big advantage of iridium spark plugs in motorcycles is the extra profit that they make for their manufacturers, distributors and retail sellers.
Now if you owned one of those cars where you had to drop the engine to remove the spark plugs, iridium plugs might be just the ticket.
I have something like that on my old daily car (clk 320 w209, v6, 2 spark plugs per cylinder). No need to drop the engine but it is so much of a pain to change them i paid someone else to do it. And he tried to shaft me by pretending he changed the hardest ones without doing them, which i saw considering there was no trace of hand / tool contact around it. He ended up admitting to it and changing them.
Now, mercedes says 100k mileage with irridium plugs, 50 to 75k with standard coppers. 350€ worth of IX plugs so i will never ever change them again vs 100ish with coppers and the distrinctive possibility of having to do it again someday ... i am a cheapskate, but i still chose to spend a bit more on the plugs and be done with it.
No performance gain to be expected from that, just peace of mind.
I do not know if i will do it to the interceptor though. access is easy and the engine is not exactly a rocket. I doubt the extended life would balance the increase in price. But it will not hurt the engine, that is for sure.