1
535 Continental GT / Re: Geoffs Modifications
« Last Post by Geoff Vader on Today at 08:03:52 pm »Guess some of you wonder why I bang on about saving weight on the bike.
I’ve attached a small spreadsheet/chart which may help explain.
I’ve taken the quoted weight of the bike as 185kg, the rider as 80kg and a ‘standard’ power improvement of 5bhp.
Rows 1 & 4 show the power as standard on the standard weight bike, and with a weight reduction of 20kg. I’ve already got rid of 15kg and expect to achieve nearer to 22kg reduction without too much more effort. These two rows are unrealistic as there’s no allowance for a rider.
So, rows 2 & 5 show the difference with an 80 kg rider. The bhp/metric tonne rises from 113 to 122 just by losing 20kg, no tuning required!
Rows 3 & 6 compare the bike with an additional 5bhp (probably a bit unrealistic at 17% improvement) and the same with reduced weight.
So, lose weight, it’s easier, cheaper and will improve acceleration.
I’ve attached a small spreadsheet/chart which may help explain.
I’ve taken the quoted weight of the bike as 185kg, the rider as 80kg and a ‘standard’ power improvement of 5bhp.
Rows 1 & 4 show the power as standard on the standard weight bike, and with a weight reduction of 20kg. I’ve already got rid of 15kg and expect to achieve nearer to 22kg reduction without too much more effort. These two rows are unrealistic as there’s no allowance for a rider.
So, rows 2 & 5 show the difference with an 80 kg rider. The bhp/metric tonne rises from 113 to 122 just by losing 20kg, no tuning required!
Rows 3 & 6 compare the bike with an additional 5bhp (probably a bit unrealistic at 17% improvement) and the same with reduced weight.
So, lose weight, it’s easier, cheaper and will improve acceleration.