The logic you are trying to support doesn't come through in the writing.
>>> All I am saying is that most of the scientists are very theoretical. <<<This literally says that most scientists don't actually exist.
Theory : a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
Theoretical: concerned with or involving the theory of a subject or area of study rather than its practical application.
Proof: evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
Definitive Proof: of a conclusion or agreement) done or reached decisively and with authority.Perhaps Mathematicians and Topologists are theoretical, but even the High Energy Particle Physicists/propeller heads at CERN are shoving & colliding voodoo bits about & recording effects. We ALL use theory all the time. We take what we think we know and try to use it to predict what happens next. Scientists don't drive public policy, Politicians do. The degree to which Politicians & Lawmakers succeed IMHO is connected to how much they actually understand about the facts they are given.
>>> Those who are alive in 100 years will know what the weather is than that will be the scientific proof. <<<
Yes - 100 years of additional Weather data SHOULD increase net understanding of how the complexities of atmospheric science actually work. Whatever Weather has existed for the last 100 years at the time of analysis 100 years from now will assist to either confirm or refute whichever weather model/theory is being examined. Definitive Proof isn't ever going to happen, as weather is too way complex for even 100 years of additional data to put
absolutely paid to an argument. Hopefully the models are better by then.
>>> If anyone is alive that is to see since CO2 is outlawed by 2050. 
<<<What does that even mean? Everyone will be dead by 2050, then ?someone? will "outlaw" carbon dioxide? Who's left then, & why would they care if they can already live in a high CO2 environment? And how exactly is CO2 guaranteed to be outlawed 30 years from now, given the constant flux of politics & the economy? Have you ever tried to get 10 people to agree on anything, let alone millions?
>>> This was by no means ment as personal offence <<<
Then carefully write what you actually know, can prove and mean to say. Keep it friendly and informative. Post pix of your ride & mods. Stay away from the conspiracy humour for awhile, too much and it looks like that's all you are about. We're all old farts here, we've all been used & abused by life; we get it and have already lived it, we don't need a steady diet of it. This place is a haven from all that, where motorcycle talk & related topics run wild & free. In the Continental forum you posted on stainless bolts in aluminum cases, referring to a white powder on the bolts. As a long-time desert dweller using saline well water for 50 years, that's salt corrosion from wash water, the salts in the water are reacting with the aluminum cases, whether there's a bolt in the hole or not. The "white rust" makes the bolts tough to extract. In industry we routinely coat bolt shafts with anti-seize to slow this process down. Better might be to swab the holes. A downside is that reduced thread friction makes it easier to overtorque & damage threads.
Here's a better methodology for talking about this topic - put in a reference confirming what you are saying:
https://www.albanycountyfasteners.com/blog/stainless-steel-and-aluminum/>>> The combination of aluminum and stainless steel causes galvanic corrosion. In order to understand why you shouldn’t use stainless steel and aluminum together, we first need to understand how galvanic corrosion works. Galvanic corrosion is the transfer of electrons from one material (anode) to another (cathode). In addition to knowing what galvanic corrosion is, we also need to understand the technical terms that go along with it.
Here are all of the technical terms we will be using during this post:
Anode – material that is positively charged, electrons leave this material
Cathode – material that is negatively charged, electrons enter this material
Electrolyte – liquid that aids in the process of electron transfer
Corrosion/corrode – Destroy or weaken metal gradually
How It Works
Galvanic corrosion occurs when two materials (an anode and a cathode) come into contact with each other and an electrolyte. Electrolytes can be environmental factors such as humidity or rainwater. When these factors come into play, electron transfer will begin to occur. Depending on the level of resistance in an electrolyte, this transfer can happen much faster. This is why salt water, an electrolyte with a very low resistance, is a common factor when considering what product to use. Due to this, it is incredibly important to consider what material you are going to use in an environment. When working with a marine, salt water environment, you even need to consider the type of stainless steel you are using. <<<
The reason to use citations is to lower resistance to thinking about the idea you are presenting. Ace himself posted a citation/link in that same thread. The Albany example citation references electrolytes as a contributing factor, so logically if the threads were kept dry & greased no reaction would occur, better defining the parameters of the material usage. That's certainly what I have seen.
The personal offense angle doesn't really apply here. I think you, just like myself, like to contribute what we know to the discussion on topics that are interesting to us. Keeping to the topic in a friendly, informative & non-combative manner best promotes useful discussion.
Topic: Long oil change intervals (Read 4526 times)