The Bridgestone's a good frame, tank & wheels. A current production engine makes it functional. Rebuilding a 1965 Bridgestone 90cc trail bike to original spec is pricey & time consuming and plays into a very limited market; it would have to be a "labour of love" which would require an emotional connection that isn't there. The present bumper crop of "cherried out" CT90 Hondas
asking $2K - $3K is counterbalanced by a wealth of cheap used bits and quite a few $200 - $400 fairly intact "Barn Finds". If/when the economy tanks, these cherries are just worth their functional value which will be a lot less that when there were folks competing with their spare play money for status symbols.
The Bridgestone's possible value to me is as a very lightweight beater "camp bike". The 90cc Honda dual range transmission would make it useful in hilly terrain as well as on the flats. The Honda powerplant has a universe of readily available bits and is readily replaceable with much more powerful modern clones if that was desired. It essentially becomes a "Honda Sport 90" but with the trail bike dual range, eliminating the need for the Bridgestones dual rear sprockets. It's of
very lightweight construction, so actual speed would require better brakes & suspension. Slow is cheap, speed will cost real money.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Sport_90Taking it back to stock trim would require a totally rebuilt power plant/gear set/clutch, a functioning 1965 carb, air box, oil pump, & exhaust system as well as the various control cables ($$$). So far I've just seen engine cases and I don't have a time machine. Bridgestone bits are rare, recreating a highly developed rotary valve 2 stroke is a just so story. The Honda option seems more reality based. If anyone wants to relieve me of this jewel for their own purposes, just speak up, no rush.
That's the real beauty of owning an old Enfield:
WE have Hitchcock's.