" nobody can deliver "; more like won't because it's way too profitable to just keep on doing what we're doing. Energy storage is is deliberately ignored and marginalized. It's more profitable to sell all new hardware to the technically-declined than adjust the fuel supply to incorporate renewable sources. Batteries are a great tool, but have weight & size limitations compared to liquid hydrocarbon fuels. There isn't a plan to cover the electrical energy usage of an all-battery-electric transportation network; you're in essence trying to create in real time a system that can deliver the same energy capacity as that released by the energy currently stored in hydrocarbon fuels. If the idea is to enrich the Utilities and auto makers, it's a good one. It took a lot of well-paid lobbyists to get it from brilliant corporate idea to public law. The all-electric transport energy demand is fuelled from fossil power plants at least 14 hours a day because there wasn't any energy storage developed. Electricity doesn't spontaneously come out of wall plugs, it has to be made to happen. Mostly that's from burning hydrocarbon fuels. Pushing usage off one step doesn't mean it isn't happening. Wind & PV are of limited application without utility-grade energy storage, lucky break for the existing petro cartels.