The way I see it, REpozer is by implication, and so are you. No one has convinced me this isn't just about being offended by Clamp. It sure seems the desired end result of one of you becoming a moderator is having the ability to delete posts by him and/or ban him from the forum. REpozer uses the phrase "some have alluded to having moderators", but doesn't that just mean "myself and others who want Clamp banned"?
Eamon
Explain or show the implication please. And I am asking politely and respectfully. I want to understand.
This is the first thread to my knowledge that anyone has brought up censors and in re reading this thread from the beginning, it was neither repozer nor my self who brought it up.
I do not see where reposers phrase "some have alluded to having moderators" means "myself and others who want Clamp banned"? rather it Indicates that he likely has received PM's that others who see a need for more active monitoring by the admins/mods or additional mods if admin deems it wise.
Lets all be careful not to read too far into things. It happens all the time and mistakenly causes friction.
A relevant example is the quotation marks you put on the second phrase above.
Those marks imply that you are quoting him, which you are clearly not.
My take is that those were the punctuation marks that came closest to conveying a sense of wondering and what if,, but others may misunderstand it as an intentional misrepresentation.
Banning and deleting is a function of the admins and I would think, not done lightly.
I do not believe that Kevin and staff would just give that over to any old body.
As for clamp getting banned that is up to him and him alone, his choices his behavior.
Topic: Volunteer forum modurators (Read 16713 times)