Do replacement cams (mild road/not race) require a power commander?
I am happy with the performance of my C5, but if decent set of mild cams added performance across the whole rev range I would be interested.
Fuel economy is incredible as stock. So I could suffer a little hit in that area.
Actually... this is the Cam that my friend is grinding. A mild/ moderate 215/230 street Cam to make it better across the rev range and inside the stock rev limiter. No extreme lifts or duration's. ... Just nice and smooth.
Usually when putting in different Cams in these bikes , with the way the stock ECU is set up for the stock Cams....I find that fuel has to be taken OUT from idle up to around 2500-3000 RPM's . Give or take a bit . So less fuel is required down low. Then... after that RPM range, things change and fuel needs to be added for the most part and in varying degree's up to red line. Much will depend on what you want your air fuel ratio to be .
I run Hitchcock's cams and valve kit with the EJK fuel controller ( no ignition adjustment) , runs nice everywhere except idle is a little crappy. I do wonder how much performance would be gained with Hitchcock's mapped PCV .
See above for the idle...
Probably not much difference between what you have and the PC-V ? The PC-V is just a lot more versatile and precise. And you can REMOVE fuel when you need to. Some ignition advance in certain places helps as well I have found.