I haven't got enough information to decide if there are risks in eating GMOs or not, so objective prudence dictates I avoid them until I'm convinced that they aren't hugely harmful.
I think "liberals" and "conservatives" both have some things right and some things wrong. Some of the idealism of the left is unrealistic and unachievable; some of the perspectives of the right come from misinformation and emotion and not objective knowledge.
Some of the perspectives of the left seem like good ideas but rushing in their direction without due diligence on their consequences is too risky. Some of the perspectives of the right resist any change no matter what the benefits of it would be which thwarts improvement.
Some on the left want to change everything and with foolish bravely rush into the future willy-nilly, while having the courage to go in new well-vetted directions fits with the US being "the land of the brave"; some of the right wish to stop all progress and freeze things where they are because they are afraid of any change, while prudence and courage to progress and accept change when it's clearly an improvement lets us grow.
Competently meeting the obligations of citizenship in the US demands objective, informed citizens; I think that the tenets of critical thinking are mandatory when one is analyzing an issue, with emotion and feelings set aside, and if there aren't enough facts or data available to produce a conclusion, none is made until further study (by one's self and/or others) produces them.
http://lifehacker.com/how-to-train-your-mind-to-think-critically-and-form-you-1516998286