Twin spark plugs reminds me of the Auxiliary Power Unit we designed for the Boeing 777.
We decided that because of the high altitude starting requirements to meet the aircraft's ETOPS requirement we would design it with two igniters in the combustor.
During the Critical Design Review one of the Boeing reliability engineers popped up and pointing at the dual igniters said, "You've decreased the reliability of the ignition system by 50%.
With two igniters, the probability of a failure is twice as high."
One of our engineers countered with the obvious by pointing out that if one igniter failed there would still be one left to start the engine thus the likelihood of the APU starting was twice as high.
The units final design has two igniters.
For those curious, ETOPS is a FAA requirement for commercial aircraft with only two engines which will fly long distances over the ocean.
If one of the main engines fails the APU must be able to start and extremely high altitudes to take over the planes electrical requirements and to provide bleed air to restart the non-running engine.
With the APU providing the electricity, the remaining main engines generator can be shut down allowing it to be dedicated to just providing propulsion.
Officially, ETOPS stands for, "Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards" but we jokingly said it meant, "Engines Turning Or Prepare to Swim".
Getting back to the twin spark on a Royal Enfield, I agree that there is not much to be gained by using two spark plugs.
Twin plugs have a better chance of igniting crappy fuel or a fuel mixture that is badly out of adjustment but assuming there is not a misfire the other spark plug is basically just going along for the ride.