I believe the factory spec sheet indicates 17.5 BHP, although the manual only lists KW @ stated RPM.
The factory specs show 27.5 HP. However that is at the crankshaft driving no accessories, ie, alternators, nothing on the primary drive, etc, no exhaust to speak of, just a bare engine. So a great drop from that they claim to the real world is a pretty standard. At least 20% is is generally about the minimum on a very efficient machine. Most factories don't even publish horsepower figures any more as all the publications test them on a rear wheel dyno so the perception of how the engines are tested make the manufacturers look bad. Basically it's all advertising hype anyway.
In the case of the Enfield and it's rather antiquated and not-so-efficient drive layout, untuned intake and exhaust systems, etc. it loses a bit more by the time the power reaches the rear wheel. But, we didn't buy these because they are crotch rockets, so it really is generally understood by the buyer that you ain't gonna be able to go fast on these beasts without considerable work.
We wanted a vintage machine without all the hassles of a vintage machine, but not expected much more performance than the original bike, but keeping the great looks and charisma. I feel I got exactly what I expected. It performs as well as it needs to in traffic, but keeps me out of the man's eyes. Just what I needed to keep me out of trouble.
I love it.
Bare